The Trench Reynolds Report

All Crime Is Personal

Tearful Testimony By Mother Of Scott Dyleski:

Scott Dykeski’s mother, Esther Fielding, testified this past Thursday in her son’s murder trial. Dyleski is accused of killing Pam Vitale, the wife of noted criminal defense attorney Daniel Horowitz…

Fielding acknowledged warning her son that his room was about to be searched by other members of the household and she also said she later destroyed some of his things, including a box of gloves and pieces of paper bearing credit card numbers and other information. Experts have testified Vitale’s attacker wore gloves.

However, Fielding said repeatedly she only worried her son was involved in a credit card scam and did not connect him to the murder of Vitale, their neighbor in the San Francisco suburb of Lafayette.

Prosecutor Harold Jewett challenged that explanation, noting that Dyleski had acknowledged the credit card fraud some days before Fielding burned the items.

“I didn’t think it out clearly,” Fielding replied. “I just panicked.”

Later, Fielding decided to turn in the things she hadn’t destroyed, giving investigators a computer hard drive and a pair of shoes among other things. According to testimony at a preliminary hearing on the case, investigators found the shoe print appeared to match a partial bloody footprint near Vitale’s body.

The defense appeared to address the inconsistencies pointed out by Jewett in Fielding’s testimony Wednesday.

Under cross-examination by defense attorney Ellen Leonida, Fielding said she takes medication to fight memory loss and hadn’t taken it Wednesday.

Not having the medication, “makes things a little foggier,” Fielding said.

4 thoughts on “Dyleski’s Mom testifies

  1. Jim says:

    memory loss ? what an excuse 😛


  2. Steph says:

    Trench, I have a really far out there theory, and I am most likely wrong… but could this be a possiblility:

    Could Scott’s friend who testified against him.. planned the whole thing? Could it have been that Scott has been framed? His friend wears his shoes? And maybe his mum was in on it aswell.

    But that doesnt explain the DNA though. The way I look at it, is you take out teh DNA and you have a framimg.

    But I oculd be very wrong. But .. Trench do you think it could be a possibility?


  3. Trench says:

    It’s not impossible but very unlikely. I’ll be talking about the DNA evidence later tonight.


  4. Jim says:

    why would his mother want to frame him ?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: