The Trench Reynolds Report

All Crime Is Personal

Dave-Cullen-alt-photo

David Cullen

The other day I posted about how the myth that the Columbine cowards were bullied is still being perpetuated. Today I came across another article that mentioned Columbine and bullying in the same breath, written by a PhD no less.

To my shock and wonder, I found out that this was not an article perpetuating the myth but actually dispelling the myth. And not only was the myth dispelled but it mentioned the man whose opinion I respect most when it comes to all things Columbine and that would be Dave Cullen. Not only did Dave Cullen write the definitive news article on Columbine called “The Depressive and the Psychopath” but he also wrote what I think is the definitive book which is simply entitled Columbine.

This is what the article’s author had to say about “Columbine”…

In the days immediately after the tragic event, there was so much misinformation fed to the public by the media, that a lot of unsubstantiated information became legend and were never questioned.

In this revelatory book, Cullen debunks several myths about Harris and Klebold, such as they were part of a group called the “Trenchcoat Mafia” or they were total social outcasts and had specifically targeted “the jocks” who had bullied them.

Instead, Cullen gives us a psychological profile of two teenage killers who were considered good students, who went to their own prom just three days before the murders, and had many friends. In what seems to me to be the greatest irony of all, Cullen shows us, often in the killers’ own words, that rather than being the “victims” who lived a fringe, isolated existence in their suburban high school, they were in fact the real bullies. They were two teenagers filled with raging hatred and contempt for almost everyone, adults and peers alike, and were bombs just waiting to explode.

Emphasis mine.

It actually warms my cold dead heart to see that there are still people out there with the rational intelligence to be responsible enough not to believe every myth, untruth and conspiracy theory about Columbine.

29 thoughts on “Dave Cullen: Columbine Mythbuster

  1. Who were their bullies?

    Like

    1. Anonymous says:

      Y’know, Trench, that’s why I like your thinking – for saying they were bullied is one thing showing how they were bullied and by whom has more substance. Proof is in the pudding and all that jazz.

      Personally, I can name the bullies I was a target of in elementary and middle school to this day – and my mother knew them too. So if they were actually bullied, where’s the names? Wouldn’t they be written in a diary/journal, school records, or something?

      Heh, who said sensational journalism was dead?

      Like

      1. And I’m just some dude with a crappy blog too.

        Like

        1. Anon says:

          For once, I agree with you. But what’s just crappy as your blog is your way of thinking.

          Like

      2. KathyK says:

        You mean you were bullied and didn’t go on a murderous rampage?

        Like

        1. Nope. I just learned to walk away. There were a lot of days I came home crying, but eventually you learn that the bullies have worse problems than I did!

          Like

      3. Anon says:

        You’re a real suck-up, aren’t you?

        Like

  2. Still looking for a name.

    Like

  3. Jadecrowe says:

    yeah, Eric Harris couldn’t find a date for the prom, but hung out that night with some 20-something chick. from what i read in Dave’s book, sounds like they were more the bullies than the bullied.

    Like

  4. Anon says:

    “To my shock and chagrin I found out that this was not an article perpetuating the myth but actually dispelling the myth.”

    Chagrin- noun: a feeling of vexation, marked by disappointment or humiliation. From Dictionary.com

    Like

  5. Dddddddddddddd says:

    One of my friends told me that he wanted to bring a gun to school and kill his tormentors. I’m not sure why he didn’t do it. Now that he’s been out of school, he’s a normal guy, except he’s really sensitive to criticism.

    Like

  6. Marley says:

    Problem is the book isn’t that great. It’s very opinionated instead of factual instead of getting information from people like Brooks Brown about Eric and Dylan he just got his research from the Sherrif’s department.

    Like

    1. You didn’t actually read the book did you?

      Like

    2. You didn’t actually read the book did you?

      Like

  7. RueMorgue says:

    You don’t expect Trench and his band of sycophants to ever see or understand what a liar Cullen is do you? You are asking too much.
    He tells them what they want to believe so he’s the undisputed authority in their eyes.
    Don’t waste your time lance. The close minded, mean spirited little crowd is an echo chamber.Nothing more.

    Like

    1. The facility you’re posting from. Are you an employee or a resident?

      Like

      1. KathyK says:

        I assume the facility you refer to is a psychiatric center.

        Like

    2. Anonymous says:

      If Cullen’s such a liar, why hasn’t he been sued for libel/slander/defamation by the Harris and/or Klebold families? Even if they were bullying victims, it wasn’t justification for a death sentence by any stretch of the imagination…what about innocents like Cassie Bernall and Rachel Scott, who had nothing to do w/any problems our psychotic loners might have had, yet still wound up dead?

      Like

  8. Kdss says:

    Trench Reynolds, you are the biggest more in the world.

    Like

  9. Kdss1 says:

    You are the biggest moron*

    Like

    1. Let me guess. You’re going to blame your ironic spelling mistake on autocorrect or some such bullcrap right?

      Like

      1. Anon says:

        Gimme a break, asshole. You’re the one who’s full o’ crap.

        Like

    2. Anon says:

      I don’t know about that. But I can tell that he’s a moron. Whoever voted you down neither respects nor understands you. Damn him or her.

      Like

  10. KathyK says:

    Oh well then that changes everything…if someone shot paperclips at them, they were perfectly justified to start shooting up everyone in the place.

    Like

  11. Dmaire1221 says:

    Don’t bother reading his book. After reading all the interviews from
    the people that did knew the two and said they were severally bullies. People
    that wont show their faces say they were bullied too. If 14 children were just
    killed in your school one teacher and it was because they snapped because they
    were bullied. Would you come out and say “yes I kinda picked on him a lot”? They
    were clearly bullied. I am in school and there is no real way to find out if
    someone is psychopath without being tested. The diaries and blogs were left for
    the media to find. I think most of what he put in the diary was to show the
    world he was tuff. Boys dont come home crying saying they were picked on very
    offen. It was a FBI profile when the said he was a phycopathy(Eric) . They
    really dont know anything about the two (Dylan and Eric) other then what the two
    wanted them to know. All I can say I found most of what Dave Cullens wrote was
    so different to the interviews with people who knew what went on with that
    school. I would love to see what Cullens would to say about the movie Bully.
    They had camera’s on for this one.

    Like

    1. Then give me the names of their supposed bullies. 

      Like

      1. Charcar08 says:

        Like they just said, no one is going to come out and admit they are the ones who bullied them. Research “the ketchup incident” when ketchup covered tampons were hurled at them in the cafeteria. And read Daniel rourbough’s father’s opinion on Dave Cullen and about why Oprah decided to cancel having him on her show. Anyways, they were bullied, and a lot of what Cullen wrote was bullshit. All the families of the victims think so, and I’d say they are a pretty great source. I don’t think the Harris’ or Klebold’s are interested

        Like

        1. Charcar08 says:

          As I was saying I doubt the Harris or klebold families are interested in suing everyone who gets facts about their sons wrong for slander… With all the literature about them out there that would be tiresome and tedious not to mention probably torturous to bring back those memories when it’s not necessary

          Like

        2. That’s strange because I can produce the names of the kids that Harris and Klebold bullied long before Columbine. There’s documented evidence of it. So how come there’s no documented evidence of the names of their supposed bullies? 

          And all the victims’ families think so? Really? Do you know them all or do you just stalk them?

          Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: