40 Million Dead

Democrats consider new tack on abortion:

(Log in info) Lazy blogging time for me again. This is an opinion piece from Cal Thomas who hits the nail on the head with the Democrats’ position on abortion…

In a Dec. 23 New York Times story headlined “Democrats Weigh De-emphasizing Abortion as an Issue,” several prominent Democrats suggest their party should at least open its doors to abortion opponents and make abortion less central in future party campaigns.

Some party leaders said Democrats might embrace at least one restriction, such as parental notification before a minor girl can get an abortion. Donna Brazile, who managed Al Gore’s 2000 presidential campaign, said, “Even I have trouble explaining to my family that we are not about killing babies.”

Maybe the reason she is having trouble is because that is precisely what is happening. More than 40 million children have been killed legally in America since the Supreme Court imposed Roe vs. Wade on the nation 32 years ago next month.

Democrats seem unconcerned that so many discarded members of the human family are not with us. These were 40 million taxpayers for new Democrat programs; at least 20 million women, some of whom might have become feminists and Democrat voters; 40 million people, one of whom might have discovered a cure for cancer or other dread diseases; 40 million once regarded as “inconvenient,” but surely not if they would have been allowed to be born; 40 million branches of family trees who will, themselves, never bear fruit and whose lines have been cut off.

Comments by Democrats trying to get back into the “moral issues” game are revealing. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, California Democrat, said Republicans had “been successful at painting the view of the pro-choice movement as abortion on demand — and nothing can be farther from the truth.” Perhaps the senator might wish to explain her voting record, which to a fair reader might prove abortion on demand is precisely what she favors.

Feinstein voted no on a criminal penalty for harming an unborn fetus during a crime (March 2004), voted no on banning partial birth abortions except for maternal life (March 2003, October 1999) and voted no on maintaining the ban on military abortions (June 2000). Feinstein was recommended by the liberal Emily’s List of pro-choice women (April 2001). She received a 100 percent rating by NARAL, the National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League, for her pro-choice voting record (December 2003).

If the public perceives that the Democratic Party favors abortion on demand, it is because of senators (and many other Democrats in Congress) like Dianne Feinstein who have not done anything to curtail abortion.

There is only one reason to restrict abortion and that is because what is being killed is a human being. Any other “reason” seeks to invoke a moral standard one has just denied.

Indeed.

God, I’m lazy.